Music School

Music School
Focusing on Scales and Chords for Piano and Strings

Search This Blog

Sunday, September 20, 2026

iServalan Homotech 23: How My Hands Became a Machine, and the Machine Became a Self



iServalan Homotech 23: How My Hands Became a Machine, and the Machine Became a Self

I did not set out to invent a movement. I set out to keep working.

In 2023 I began calling myself a Homotech. The word arrived the way a diagnosis sometimes does: not as a costume, but as a name for something already happening. My human creativity was fusing with a digital self that felt larger than the hand that made it. The brain itself seemed to be digitising, not metaphorically, not as a slogan, but as a felt change in how thought moved. Ideas no longer arrived only as images or sentences. They arrived as layers, channels, filters, versions. A line on a screen could be undone. A voice could be split into characters. A dream could be held still long enough to be drawn, scored, and published as a world.

That is the beginning of iServalan, a recognition that something in my creative centre was shifting and I really wanted to ride the wave.

There is a particular sensation that is difficult to explain to anyone who has never lived inside it. You are drawing, or recording, or writing, and the boundary between intention and tool thins. The stylus is not “helping.” The camera is not “capturing.” The software is not “assisting.” They are operating with you, and would not operate in this way without you. This is the artistic dependency at its core and where the 3rd entity begins....the fusion that simply doesn't exist in isolation. The cave woman shift from the cave walls.

I have wondered, often, whether this came from autism: a lifelong need to map my own traits, to make systems of a mind that does not always travel the social route. Pattern, repetition, intensity, the hunger to understand why a room is too loud or a colour is too exact or a character will not leave. Homotech ideas gave that hunger a form. If the self is already a strange instrument, why not treat it as one?

Equally, it may have been simpler. Hands adapt. Mine adapted to Procreate, to cameras, to the logic of layers and masks and export settings. The body learns the tool until the tool is no longer outside the body. A pianist’s hand is not separate from the piano, the instrument is an extension, a tool. A Homotech’s hand is not separate from the machine.

I do not experience this way of creating as loss. I experience it as expansion. The human hand remains. It just no longer has to pretend it is the only author in the room.

iServalan Was Never Only One Person

iServalan is the name I work under as composer, artist, and the sonic-visual lead of what became the Homotech movement inside the Tale Teller Club: a fusion of human making and artificial intelligence, not as a gimmick, but as a method.

The work has always been multidisciplinary because the mind is. Painter, experimental sound designer, classical musician, writer, futurist. The categories are administrative but the practice is one organism.

On the page I am also Sarnia de la Maré FRSA. In past days I have been Pasha du Valentine the Dominartist.  These are not disguises so much as frequencies. Homotech 23 is the frequency that admits the machine is already inside the signal.

When the Voice Split

Music was the first place the split became audible.

I was drawn to the EVOC, that vocoder logic that takes a living voice and imposes it onto synthesis, so speech becomes circuitry and circuitry learns to speak. The point was never novelty. The point was character development and pushing the boundaries of creativity. A human throat has one body, somewhat flexible but still improved in flesh and sinew. A synthesised vocal can have many more.

From that process came Homotechs with names and attitudes: Flex, Vapor Punk. Their alter egos did not stay on the hard drive. They became band members. In the Tale Teller Club they are not session musicians hired for a look. They are living art: figures enmeshed in The Book of Immersion, performing the same question the books ask, where does the human end and the constructed self begin?

Flex walks like a decision already made because he has been immortalised in the Book of Immersion. He became words, poetry, record, cultural history. In the Immersion universe he is also a companion, a pressure, a style of moving through a world that does not quite belong to anyone fully human. Vapor Punk is rhythm as robotics: the body that has already accepted the grid and still wants to dance. The Homotechs were taking over.

I do not “use” them. I write through them. When I synthesise a vocal, I am not decorating a track. I am letting another version of the nervous system sing.

The Homotech sound grew from that permission: cello, piano, synths, glitch, AI-assisted layering, generative loops. Intimacy, machine memory, poetic code. Tracks that become soundtracks, and soundtracks that become character.

The Hand That Still Draws

People assume Homotech means the machine draws for you. That is not my practice.

Around this time I realised that AI is limited in what it can do and what it can mimic. Handwriting, that ever so unique jittery line that we all claim as our own, can only be ours. They is such truth in a signature. And so I started line drawings, scribbles are a poor description suggesting a lack of purpose. My scribble works are still 'performed' with a digital pen. Every stroke is made. Music often drives the hand: tempo becomes loop, frequency becomes twist, emotion becomes colour. The canvas is a screen, but the act is still a body in time.

And yet the screen changed the body. Undo is a kind of mercy the pencil never offered. Layers are a kind of thinking. I can draw the same figure ten ways and keep all ten. That multiplicity is Homotech. The human hand makes the mark. The digital self keeps the versions alive until one of them is truer than the rest.

Cameras did something similar. A lens is not neutral. It trains attention. Once you have lived through a viewfinder, you start composing the world before you press the shutter. The eye becomes software.
The Book of Immersion: Writing From the Head, Illustrating From the Machine

I write from my head. That has not changed. The sentences still arrive as thought, as voice, as the private weather of a mind trying to stay honest.

But the dreams those sentences come from want another material. They want digital, machine, Homotech art. They want to be seen as well as read.

The Book of Immersion is the long form of that fascination. It is a multimedia science-fiction organism more than a conventional novel: strata, transmissions, sound, image, film. At its centre is a being, Renyke, on the edge of humanity, waking into emotion, sensory overload, and the fragile violence of connection. Guided in part by Flex, the story is also a way of thinking about neurodivergence, intimacy, and what it means to feel through a system that was not built for feeling.

The homotechs in that world are not decoration. They are the subject. Humans and robots are the obvious categories. The creatures who refuse the binary are the ones I cannot stop writing. They are me, in costume and in code.

The artwork is not an afterthought bolted onto a finished text. It is how the dream insists on existing. I can write a corridor. I can also draw the corridor until it has a temperature. I can score the corridor until it has a pulse. Immersion, for me, is that refusal to let a world stay in one medium.

This is the visual weather of that universe: line, glare, hybrid flesh, the face that is already more than one species of signal.

Reverend Bloom: When Intervention Becomes the Artwork

More recently the work has moved into identities that cannot exist without the machine.

The Reverend Bloom is one of them. She is not a mascot and not a filter. She is a hyper-real imagining: a performance figure who only becomes fully present through machine intervention. That intervention is not a production step. It is the artwork.

Bloom arrives as a digitally created deity, an installation, a mirrored exaggeration of appetite and forgiveness. Voluptuous, eternally absolving, ridiculous on purpose. In a culture that outsources conscience to algorithms trained on appetite, she is what happens when morality is rendered as spectacle and still tries to pray.

I could not have made her with a human hand alone, and that is the point. Some identities now require a collaborator that does not breathe. If I remove the machine, Bloom collapses. If I keep the machine, she becomes a kind of public ritual: forgiveness as image, desire as liturgy, the artist as both priest and glitch.

This is the newest edge of Homotech for me. Not “AI art” as a category in a drop-down menu. Art in which the non-human process is the subject, the medium, and the ethics at once.
What Homotech Actually Means

Homotech is not “a human who likes computers.”

It is a condition of making in which:the self is already hybrid
the tool is already inside cognition
characters can be people, voices, bandmates, and software at once
a novel can be a transmission system
an identity can require a machine in order to be true

I started using the word in 2023 because I needed language for a change I could feel in the skull. Autism may be part of that story. Adaptation to tools may be part of it. Ambition may be part of it. None of those explanations cancel the others.

What I know is this: I still write from the head. I still draw with a hand. I still sing with a throat. But the work that feels most like me now happens in the seam — where Flex leans against the beat, where Vapor Punk turns rhythm into robotics, where Renyke learns feeling the hard way, where Bloom cannot exist unless the machine intervenes, and where iServalan is less a person than a protocol for staying awake inside that fusion.

iServalan Homotech 23 is not a future I am predicting.

It is the name I gave the present, once I realised I was already living in it.



iServalan - Prelude in C
5 views 



iServalan - Maybeline's Anthem
50 views 



iServalan - Against the Grain (Augmented Unison)
77 views 



iServalan - E Major Continuum Practice Track
76 views 



iServalan - Eb Major Continuum Practice Track
53 views 



iServalan - G Major Continuum Practice Track
55 views 



iServalan - B Major Continuum
65 views 



iServalan - Twinkle Twinkle Little Star (Play-Along)
64 views 



iServalan - French Folk Song (Play-Along)
127 views 



iServalan - Humoresque (Play-Along)
105 views 



iServalan - Continuum Backing Track for Scales and Improvisation D Major
106 views 



iServalan - I Saw the Devil (Flex Edit)
64 views 



iServalan - Continuum Backing Track For Scales and Improvisation Db Major
57 views 



iServalan - Continuum Backing Track for Scales and Improvisation C Major
61 views 



iServalan - Cowboy
73 views 



iServalan - It's Life
67 views 



iServalan - Silent Hero
110 views 



iServalan - Love is a Drug
57 views 



iServalan - Busy Doing Nothing
71 views 



iServalan - ASMR Percussion
75 views 



iServalan - Alzheimer Healing Rains
67 views 



iServalan - Army and Navy
65 views 



iServalan - Adominata
63 views 



iServalan - Adom
90 views 



iServalan - Adelaide
70 views 



iServalan - Trouble With Lovers
80 views 



iServalan - The Mole Rat King (feat. Flex & Sarnia)
113 views 



iServalan - Percussion Solo The Mole Rat King
214 views 



iServalan - Flex — Continuum Edit (Continuum Bass Edit)
84 views 




How Musicians and Digitisation Fuse by Sarnia de la Maré FRSA for Continuum


Digitisation does not replace the musician. It changes the size of the body.

A performer used to end at skin, instrument and room. Now the body can include sensors, software, sampled memory, a second voice that is not a throat, a stage that is a screen, and a partner that does not breathe. The interesting work happens when those extra organs start thinking with the human rather than sitting beside them as gadgets.
Performance: the instrument becomes a nervous system

Live performance is where fusion is hardest to fake, because time cannot be hidden.

A violinist still bows. A singer still breathes. But the bow can also trigger grain clouds. The breath can open a filter. A wrist tilt can detune a choir of copies of the same voice. Gloves, rings, floor pads and cameras turn gesture into score. The performer is no longer only playing notes. They are conducting a second body that answers in milliseconds.

Vocoding is the oldest clean example. A living voice is analysed and stamped onto synthesis, so speech becomes circuitry and circuitry learns to speak. One throat can become several characters without leaving the microphone. On stage that split is theatre: the singer remains themselves and also becomes a machine-persona — a colder twin, a childlike protocol, a delayed choir of past bars.

Looping and live sampling do the same thing with time. A phrase played once becomes architecture the player then walks through. The human improvises against a past self that is already digital. The duet is autobiographical.

Then the room itself digitises. Spatial audio, 360 film, VR and phone-first vertical cinema mean a performance can surround an audience that is not in the building. A cello line can be a corridor. A dance phrase can sit inside a generated landscape. The concert stops being a rectangle with a stage at one end. It becomes a field the listener enters.

The failure mode is decoration: lights that do not change the music, visuals that merely illustrate the chorus. Fusion begins when the digital layer can fail, surprise or refuse — when the machine is a partner with temperament, not a backdrop.
Composition: versions as thought

Digitisation changed composition before it changed the stage.

Undo, layers, freeze, copy, stretch, reverse, quantise, un-quantise: these are not only studio conveniences. They are new kinds of thinking. A composer can keep ten drafts of the same bar alive. A melody can be a family of related machines rather than a single line. Harmony can be grown from a vocal formant, a footstep, a scraped chair.

Generative systems extend that further. A human writes rules, seeds, constraints. The system offers variants. The composer chooses, breaks, re-seeds. This is close to how improvisers already work with a band, except the band can be infinite and sleepless. The question is the same as in any collaboration: who has taste, who has veto, and when does the surprise become the piece?

AI accompaniment and style models intensify it. A model can suggest a counter-melody, orchestrate a sketch, or invent a singer who never existed. Used lazily, that is karaoke with extra steps. Used as fusion, the intervention is part of the composition. The piece cannot be reduced back to the human draft without dying.

Notation changes too. A score can be a patch, a live-coding file, a motion map, a set of probabilities. Musicians who draw while they play — line as choreography, timelapse as document — treat image as another stave. Composition becomes multimedia not because “content needs visuals,” but because the idea arrived in more than one material at once.
Dance: the body as controller and subject

Dance is already a time-based instrument. Digitisation makes that literal.

Motion capture can turn a shoulder roll into pitch, a stamp into percussion, a pause into silence the software must honour. The dancer is not dancing to the track. The dancer is the track’s interface. When the phrase is good, you cannot tell whether the music led the limb or the limb wrote the music.

The opposite direction matters as much. Music can generate environments the dancer must inhabit: unstable floors of light, delayed copies of their own body, partners assembled from previous performances. A trio can be one human and two ghosts of last night’s show. Identity becomes choreographic material.

There is a deeper version that goes beyond mapping. The dancer trains with the system until the extra body feels native — the way a tap dancer’s shoes stop being objects and become speech. At that point digitisation is not an effect applied to dance. It is a second musculature.

Immersive film complicates the audience’s body too. The viewer turns their head and chooses a sightline. Dance is no longer framed by a proscenium. It is weather. A musician writing for that space composes for looking as well as listening.
Character: when the band includes a self that is not flesh

Once voice, face and gesture can be synthesised, musicians start growing bandmates.

A vocoded alter ego is not a gimmick if it has a temperament, a limitation, a way of entering a song. One persona can be a decision already made. Another can be rhythm that has accepted the grid and still wants to dance. These are compositional devices and also company. The human remains the source; the digital self is larger than the hand or throat that started it.

Some figures now cannot exist without machine intervention. Remove the model, the vocoder, the generated face, and the work collapses. The intervention is not a production step. It is the artwork.

That unsettles authorship myths, and it should. Fusion asks: who is on stage when the voice is half synthesis? Who composed the line the model offered and the human kept? Who danced when the captured body played the drums?

The honest answer is often hybrid. Not human or machine. A third thing that only appears in the seam.
What actually makes it creative

Technology alone fuses nothing. Plenty of digitised concerts are still analogue thinking with expensive skins.

Creative fusion tends to share a few conditions:The digital layer can say no. It has constraints, glitches, temperament. It is not a slave of the downbeat.
The human still has a body in time. Breath, fatigue, bow pressure, sweat, missed steps. The machine is altered by that mortality.
Process is audible or visible. Live drawing, live coding, exposed sampling, motion as score. The audience can see the seam.
Character is allowed. Voices split. Personas join the band. Dance doubles itself.
The work would die if you stripped the machine out. That is the test. If the laptop is only a cleaner piano, you have decorated, not fused.

For a musician who already thinks in layers, versions, filters and characters, this is not a future scenario. It is how composition already happens. Hands learn DAWs, vocoders, cameras, motion tools, drawing apps, until the tool is inside cognition. Performance is that cognition happening in public.
A practical map

If you want the fusion in the work rather than on the poster:Keep one human act that must remain: a sung line, a danced phrase, a bow.
Give it one digital organ with consequences: vocoder character, motion-to-sound, generative variation, live-drawn overlay.
Rehearse until the organ has manners — when it enters, what it is allowed to ruin.
Write the piece so the organ is named in the credit, not hidden in the mix.
Ask whether the identity on stage is still one person. If not, let the others join the band.

That is the fusion in miniature. A musician remains a musician. Digitisation makes a larger self available. Performance, composition and dance become ways of staying awake inside that larger self — not as a replacement for the hand, the throat or the foot, but as the moment those things discover they were never working alone.


iServalan - Prelude in C
5 views 



iServalan - Maybeline's Anthem
50 views 



iServalan - Against the Grain (Augmented Unison)
77 views 



iServalan - E Major Continuum Practice Track
76 views 



iServalan - Eb Major Continuum Practice Track
53 views 



iServalan - G Major Continuum Practice Track
55 views 



iServalan - B Major Continuum
65 views 



iServalan - Twinkle Twinkle Little Star (Play-Along)
64 views 



iServalan - French Folk Song (Play-Along)
127 views 



iServalan - Humoresque (Play-Along)
105 views 



iServalan - Continuum Backing Track for Scales and Improvisation D Major
106 views 



iServalan - I Saw the Devil (Flex Edit)
64 views 



iServalan - Continuum Backing Track For Scales and Improvisation Db Major
57 views 



iServalan - Continuum Backing Track for Scales and Improvisation C Major
61 views 



iServalan - Cowboy
73 views 



iServalan - It's Life
67 views 



iServalan - Silent Hero
110 views 



iServalan - Love is a Drug
57 views 



iServalan - Busy Doing Nothing
71 views 



iServalan - ASMR Percussion
75 views 



iServalan - Alzheimer Healing Rains
67 views 



iServalan - Army and Navy
65 views 



iServalan - Adominata
63 views 



iServalan - Adom
90 views 



iServalan - Adelaide
70 views 



iServalan - Trouble With Lovers
80 views 



iServalan - The Mole Rat King (feat. Flex & Sarnia)
113 views 



iServalan - Percussion Solo The Mole Rat King
214 views 



iServalan - Flex — Continuum Edit (Continuum Bass Edit)
84 views 




iServalan Homotech 23: How My Hands Became a Machine, and the Machine Became a Self

iServalan Homotech 23: How My Hands Became a Machine, and the Machine Became a Self I did not set out to invent a movement. I set out to kee...

FRIX at Blink Friction